After decades behind bars, Minnesota inmates serving life sentences must pin their hopes for freedom on just one man.
Paul Schnell, the newly appointed Department of Corrections commissioner who determines which offenders are granted supervised release, isn't sure that's fair — or wise.
"Should justice be dependent on who sits in the commissioner of Corrections role?" he said recently. "It's a huge responsibility. I certainly don't want to release anybody that's going to pose a public safety risk."
Schnell believes that responsibility should be shared. He's endorsing a bill now being debated in the Legislature to establish a five-member, bipartisan review board tasked with deciding lifers' fates.
If approved, it would roll back sole discretionary powers awarded to the DOC commissioner in 1982, when Minnesota abolished its formal parole board system.
That system "was really a product of the time," said Kelly Mitchell, executive director at the University of Minnesota's Robina Institute of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice. Concerns over the subjective nature of parole decisions and the possibility of unfair racial disparities prompted Minnesota's transition to its current determinate sentencing system — where there is no early release for good behavior.
That change left only a small number of lifers hanging in the balance, a percentage that lawmakers likely saw as too insignificant to retain a parole board for, Mitchell said. "It probably says that our Legislature was trying to be efficient and streamline the process," she said.
Minnesota is one of only four states where the commissioner maintains unilateral authority over who is freed.