Editorial counterpoint: George Floyd Square is serving the community well

As someone who resides four blocks from George Floyd Square, I read with interest "Reach a decision on 38th and Chicago" (editorial, Jan. 18), but was disappointed by its omissions and disinformation. It seems the Star Tribune spoke to a few city leaders but neglected to perform due diligence and include any account from the actual community.

The editorial gives three reasons to open the intersection. First, for first responder access.

However, EMS and the Minneapolis Fire Department have entered the space many times and were not impeded. When questioned directly, both have stated publicly they had no trouble accessing the area.

Second, for safety reasons, referring to an "increase in crime in the area." The Star Tribune reported that crime rose by an even higher rate in other neighborhoods, and City Council Vice President Andrea Jenkins has said, "If George Floyd Square was the only reason for the increase in crime, then every place else in the city and in the country would have stable crime rates, and that is not the case."

Third, access for "street cleaning, rubbish removal and snowplowing." Public Works performs these services daily. And in referencing a (nonscientific) survey, the editorial neglects to mention that 24% of neighbors wrote in that they desired justice before the intersection is opened while 19% would like it closed indefinitely. That combined 43% is especially significant when these weren't even options on the survey.

Has the Star Tribune interviewed more than a handful of city officials to inform this position? When the city put forth the question to the community, "What does justice look like?" neighborhood leaders polled businesses, churches, elders and residents. The result, Resolution 001, outlines 24 demands for justice to open the streets, including jobs for young people, undoing racism training for the Black community and a contingency fund for BIPOC businesses within the area.

The city's response so far has been inadequate. A response to city leadership explained that while what the city is doing generally to address systemic racism is good, they have not yet addressed most of the 24 demands themselves which include direct investment into the communities that immediately surround where George Floyd was killed. So far, the funding proffered has been for existing programs, programs that do not serve this specific area or are nebulous promises such as "co-creating a vision." They do not address the reasonable demands for justice.

I invite everyone who believes 38th Street and Chicago Avenue should be opened to join us in seeking justice. Our neighborhood is so much more than a "thoroughfare." I urge the Star Tribune to do in-depth reporting and speak with community leaders of the movement. People come here from all over the world to stand in solidarity for racial justice, express their pain and hope, and pay respect those who died unjust deaths.

It is the epicenter of a global racial reckoning, but it is also our neighborhood — a place over-policed and over-criminalized, a place where justice is long overdue in a city notorious for racial disparities.

As the daily paper of record, the Star Tribune has a powerful platform from which to speak. I challenge the Star Tribune to seek justice with its craft. The Star Tribune Editorial Board called George Floyd Square "an important symbol for racial justice and reconciliation." Where is the justice or reconciliation? And shouldn't the site be more than just a "symbol," but an instigation, a true reckoning, the very manifestation of justice?