Kathy Connell never thought she'd see it in Minnesota: deforestation.
But last year she watched with dread as the pine trees surrounding her tiny vegetable farm 60 miles northwest of Brainerd were torn out and heaped into piles of slash.
Now she fears what might come next — huge potato fields, aerial pesticides and contaminated drinking water. Already her neighbors are paying thousands of dollars to dig deeper wells. "To me the earth is a God-given gift," she said. "It's morally wrong to poison the water."
The forests of central Minnesota — a region that has the state's highest deer densities and that protects a largely pristine but vulnerable aquifer — are being cleared at an accelerating pace, and regulators are scrambling to find a way to protect them.
It's part of a bigger, mostly invisible transformation in the large watershed that drains into the upper Mississippi River, and which supplies drinking water for 1.7 million people in the Twin Cities. Since 2006, some 275 square miles of natural land in the Upper Mississippi watershed has been converted to row-crop agriculture, according to a new University of Minnesota analysis — much of it sandy soils and forests where no one ever expected to see farming.
"We didn't see this coming," state hydrologist Darrin Hoverson said at a recent conservation conference. "And we cannot see where it's going to go."
This rapid transformation is adding urgency to a growing debate: Should Minnesota use tax money devoted to clean water to fix its polluted lakes, streams and wetlands, or to protect what remains undamaged?
"Let's avoid the situations we've seen in other parts of Minnesota," said Rich Biske, freshwater conservation director for the Nature Conservancy in Minnesota, which is studying how to preserve the watershed and protect the Mississippi. "It's incredibly challenging to go backward."