In a few weeks, the first shipments of the H1N1 flu vaccine will arrive in Minnesota, and Stephanie Pelach, who is six months pregnant, will have a decision to make.
Should she get a vaccine, approved only weeks ago, that has never been tested in pregnant women? Or take her chances with a flu strain that can be especially dangerous during pregnancy?
For Pelach, who lives in New Brighton, it's a sobering choice. "There is this slight concern -- is this safe for me, is this safe for my baby?" she said. "I wasn't expecting it to be this emotional of a decision."
Health officials say that pregnant women should be among the first to get the new vaccine.
But they know it will be an uphill battle persuading some people -- even those who are at high risk -- to take it.
"With vaccines, you're asking a currently healthy person to do something to prevent a future harm," said Dr. Greg Poland, a Mayo Clinic expert in pandemic flu and infectious diseases. "To me, it's an easy decision. But I recognize not everybody would feel that way."
Many major medical organizations, such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, are urging pregnant women to get the shots. Experts say the vaccine for H1N1 -- also known as swine flu -- is basically a variation on the seasonal flu shots that have been used for decades, made by the same manufacturers, using the same processes.
But advocates are running into something of a cultural backlash from those who believe that the vaccine is unnatural, unnecessary or unsafe.