An attorney for one of the former Minneapolis police officers charged in the May 25 killing of George Floyd filed motions Thursday to dismiss the charges against his client, but if the trial proceeds, he wants it moved out of the metro.
Attorney Thomas Plunkett argued that prosecutors have publicly shared " 'potentially' prejudicial" evidence and that former officer J. Alexander Kueng did not aid or abet a criminal assault that led to Floyd's death.
Kueng and former officers Thomas Lane and Tou Thao are charged as accomplices to manslaughter and murder in the incident.
Former officer Derek Chauvin, who knelt on Floyd's neck for nearly eight minutes, is charged with one count each of second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter.
In his motion to dismiss the case against Kueng, Plunkett argued that the restraint Chauvin used was "reasonable" because it met training standards in a case where a suspect was actively resisting arrest. Even if the restraint of Floyd was an assault, Plunkett wrote, there's no evidence that Kueng knew Chauvin was going to commit a crime.
"Kueng could not intentionally aid and abet an act that he did not know was criminal," Plunkett said. "Chauvin was the senior officer and Kueng followed Chauvin's lead."
If the case does go to trial March 8 as scheduled, Plunkett wrote in a separate motion, it should be moved out of the seven-county metro area. He proposed Stearns County or another county with the "appropriate facilities and demographics."
Prosecutors have released evidence that could create a "reasonable likelihood" that a fair trial is impossible in the metro, Plunkett argued. Plunkett didn't cite the specific evidence, but noted that more than 1,700 local news articles have been published about the case.