Janne Flisrand was about 25 when she bought the 1903 Minneapolis fourplex that has been her home for 22 years.
She and a handful of friends had been renting a "dumpy" house with a leaking shower in a northern suburb when she found the four-unit building, which included a garden-level studio apartment and three larger ones stacked above. The front porch was rotting, but the fourplex had an irresistible location in the bustling heart of Uptown.
"We scraped together a down payment," she said, buying the building with her then partner and renting to their other housemates. "The plan was for all of us to move in together."
Over the decades, renters have come and gone. But Flisrand, who bought out her former partner 10 years ago, has stayed. She's now in her mid-40s, and there's nowhere else she'd rather be.
"It's the exact location I want," she said.
Fourplexes have become a point of controversy in Minneapolis ever since the city unveiled a proposal to allow buildings of up to four units to be built in every neighborhood. (Now, about two-thirds of the city is zoned to allow only single-family homes or duplexes.)
The fourplex proposal is just one part of a broad update to the city's comprehensive plan, called Minneapolis 2040, designed to address future needs, including housing. But residents have loudly voiced concerns that fourplexes will bring increased traffic, noise and investor-owned rental properties to some of the city's most desirable neighborhoods.
After a period of public feedback, the city is now working on a revised draft of the plan, expected to be published this fall. The revised draft scales back some of the most far-reaching density goals for future development, and would three- and four-unit buildings on larger lots. Whatever shape the final plan takes, it appears likely that at least some new fourplexes will be added to the city's housing stock in the years ahead.