A Republican legislator has been ruled ineligible for re-election because he does not live in his district, the state Supreme Court ruled Thursday.
Rep. Bob Barrett, a Republican representing District 32B, had claimed he lived in a rental home in Taylors Falls, but he also owns a home outside the district in Shafer.
DFL activists tracked activity at the rental home and presented their case to the courts, saying that Barrett was not actually living there six months before the election, and so did not meet the residency requirement.
A quirk in state law now nullifies the results of the upcoming November election because Barrett has been thrown off the ballot less than 80 days before the election. A Valentine's Day special election will now determine the district's lawmaker, the court affirmed.
Barrett released a statement in which he expressed disappointment in the decision and said he and his family had been subject to DFL harassment for the past three years, including "peeking in our bedroom windows, sitting in a car at the end of our street and setting up spy cams to surveil me from which over 800 photos were taken, not just of me but also of our neighbors."
"As a former Democrat myself, I am ashamed for my former political party," said Barrett, who was first elected in 2010 and serves as vice chairman of the House Taxes Committee.
Barrett also thanked his constituents and indicated he would not run in the February special election, which means Republicans will have to recruit a candidate and go through a nomination contest.
Stakes are high
The stakes of that special election could be enormous. Republicans currently control the House by a 73-61 majority. The House DFL caucus expects to pick up some seats due to higher turnout among their voters in a presidential election year. If the DFL picks up five or six seats in November, the House would stand at 67-66 until the February special election.