Minnesota lawmakers seeking to broaden the state's fire sprinkler mandate to old high-rise buildings are weighing the decades-old trade-off between cost and saving lives.
An emotional discussion is unfolding months after a fire killed five people in a public high-rise in Minneapolis that lacked sprinklers in some key areas. That deadly blaze brought new focus on the number of older buildings in Minnesota that lack systems to knock down fires because they were built before current mandates went into effect.
While veteran fire officials praise sprinklers as effective tools for preventing deaths and property damage, some of Minnesota's largest housing providers say they fear a new requirement would place a financial burden on landlords who already struggle to keep up with the maintenance in aging buildings.
They argue that any new sprinkler requirements must come with state funding — an echo of calls that killed similar measures in the 1990s.
Among them is the Minnesota chapter of the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials, which represents public housing agencies across the state. Shannon Guernsey, the group's executive director, said they "appreciate the intent" of a sprinkler mandate and support it.
"The challenge is the financing of it," she said.
New calls to retrofit older buildings with sprinklers came to a head after five people died in November at the Cedar High Apartments, a high-rise operated in the Cedar-Riverside area by the Minneapolis Public Housing Authority. All five victims died of smoke inhalation. The building, constructed about 50 years ago, had sprinklers on its lower levels but not in the apartments where the fire occurred.
Twenty-five years before the fatal fire, state lawmakers passed measures that would have required sprinklers to be added to old high-rise buildings. Twice, then-Gov. Arne Carlson vetoed them. He has since said that he thinks lawmakers "failed" because they did not work harder to reach a compromise.