(The Minnesota Star Tribune)
It's Time for Journalists to Talk Climate Change Solutions. Nieman Reports has an interesting post; here's a clip: "...A study published last year in the journal Global Environmental Change found that only 2% of global climate coverage from 2006 to 2018 focused on clean energy. About 1% of the more than 71,000 stories analyzed covered divestment from fossil fuel companies. And about 1% covered energy efficiency. All three topics are key to making the economy carbon neutral, slowing the climate crisis, and making the planet safer. TV news networks, like ABC, NBC, CBS, and Fox, mention solutions in their climate change reporting on their nightly newscasts and Sunday shows less than 30% of the time in 2020 — and that percentage declined from the year before, according to a 2021 Media Matters report. There are plenty of organizations trying to change this and inject a "solutions mindset" into climate reporting..."
(The Minnesota Star Tribune)
What Does the Future Hold for Coastal Cities with Climate Change In Mind. Multiple threats will require creativity and flexibility, and a willingness to take the long view and invest in storm and water-resilient solutions. Here's an excerpt from ArchDaily: "...As the climate deteriorates, many initiatives have already been put in place by governments and NGO's to maintain coastal communities. Looking beyond large-scale engineering solutions such as constructing banks and flood walls, the "Sponge City" approach uses nature itself as a planning system, where rivers and canals are integrated with trees, parks, and forests to create a natural infrastructure. Instead of using concrete to build a rainwater channel that redirects the water elsewhere, the land absorbs the excess water like a sponge, and uses it to cultivate the land. Sponge cities can be heavily seen in China, such as in the port city of Ningbo, where a 3km strip of brownfield was transformed into an eco-corridor and public park. Similarly, Shanghai has transformed its "Land of Starry Sky" park into a sponge facility, using permeable materials to absorb rainwater..."
(The Minnesota Star Tribune)
Arctic Greening Won't Save the Climate. Here's Why. The Conversation explains: "Satellite images show the Arctic has been getting greener as temperatures in the far northern region rise three times faster than the global average. Some theories suggest that this "Arctic greening" will help counteract climate change. The idea is that since plants take up carbon dioxide as they grow, rising temperatures will mean Arctic vegetation will absorb more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, ultimately reducing the greenhouse gases that are warming the planet. But is that really happening? I am a biologist who focuses on the response of ecosystems to climate change including tundra ecosystems..."
(NOAA/The Minnesota Star Tribune)
A Recipe for Climate Disasters. A post at The Atlantic (paywall) connects the dots with increasingly favorable conditions for landslides: "...Landslides happen for many reasons, set off by earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, or human behavior. But "probably the most common driver we see for landslides worldwide is rainfall," Ben Leshchinsky, an associate professor in the College of Forestry at Oregon State University, told me. "Say you have lots of rain. What that effectively does is it reduces the strength of the soil. When that soil strength decreases, it can reach a point where it fails, and naturally just slides away." And climate change is creating more extreme rain events. The 13 inches of rain that triggered the landslide in Uttarakhand was a more than 400 percent increase over the daily norm of 2.5 inches. Rain is why landslide researchers are warning that climate change may make landslides more likely, and that we are not prepared for this growing risk..."
Climate Change Impacts Compound Each Other To Make Lots Of Things Worse: More perspective from Climate Nexus: "Drought and extreme rainfall, both exacerbated by climate change, are increasing air pollution and landslide risks, compounding the impacts of continued extraction and combustion of fossil fuels. As drought conditions in the U.S. push east, wildfires are following. Hundreds of thousands of acres have burned in Colorado and Texas in the last few weeks alone, and on Tuesday red flag warnings covered nearly 10 million people across multiple Plains states while fires burned southeast of Birmingham, Alabama. New research published in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences finds dangerous particulate pollution (also known as PM2.5) from wildfires will increase regardless of emissions reductions. Without reductions, air pollution could triple, with extremes in fire and resulting pollution of 2017-2020 occurring every 3-5 years. Extreme precipitation is also increasing due to climate change, thus increasing risks of dangerous landslides. Longer and more extreme wildfire seasons, however, are compounding the danger by incinerating the vegetation that holds mountainside soil in place during heavy rains, even years after the burn." (Drought and wildfire risks: CNN; Red flag warnings: Washington Post $, CNN; Alabama: AP; Wildfire pollution: Inside Climate News, Yale Climate Connections; Landslide risks: The Atlantic; Climate Signals background: Drought, Wildfires, Extreme precipitation increase)