Despite the promises of choice and affordability offered by the federal health care overhaul, many Minnesotans outside the Twin Cities area aren't seeing much of either.
In certain pockets of the state, shoppers on the new MNsure website have just a handful of insurance companies to choose from and face much higher premiums than those available in the metro area.
"I've got clients who are looking at paying $500 more a month than they're currently paying," said Rod Woxland, a broker with Minnesota Garot Christman Agency in Rochester. "They feel they're left out of this deal. If they want coverage, they have to pay the price or drive elsewhere."
The gap is greatest around Rochester, home of the Mayo Clinic, and surrounding counties in the southeastern corner of the state. Residents there have one or two insurance companies to choose from and face prices that are nearly double those in the Twin Cities.
People in the Arrowhead region of northeastern Minnesota, particularly outside of Duluth, also face lackluster competition. Residents have three choices of insurers and pay about a third more than the Twin Cities, where consumers can choose among all five of the state's major carriers and enjoy the state's lowest prices.
One thing the higher-priced areas have in common is a dominant hospital and clinic system — Mayo in the southeast and Essentia Health in the northeast.
Northern Minnesota has long trended toward higher medical costs, said University of Minnesota health economist Roger Feldman, perhaps because it is dominated by steelworkers and mine workers whose unions may have negotiated richer benefits that are both well-needed and well-used.
An aging population with more medical needs and Essentia's market power create a difficult market. "Costs are higher up there because providers charge more," Feldman said.