It's now up to a jury to decide whether a St. Paul police officer should be held criminally culpable for repeatedly kicking an innocent bystander in the chest, causing serious injuries while a K-9 mauled the man's leg.
Federal prosecutors and defense attorneys presented closing arguments Monday in the culmination of a nine-day trial that included graphic video of the incident, testimony from St. Paul officers — including the police chief — and allegations that a "code of silence" deterred some from speaking up.
The officer, 32-year-old Brett Palkowitsch, was indicted in January on one count of deprivation of rights in connection with the 2016 incident, which left Frank Baker, an unarmed 52-year-old black man, with seven broken ribs and two collapsed lungs from the kicks and other injuries from the dog bites.
Neither side disputes that Palkowitsch kicked Baker, and neither argued that Baker was the armed suspect police were looking for. Rather, the jury will be instructed to weigh whether he used "more force than a reasonable officer would use under the circumstances."
Prosecutors for the U.S. Attorney's Office portrayed Palkowitsch as a "bully" who willfully defied academy training and seemed to take pleasure in kicking an innocent man already being ravaged by a dog. They say Palkowitsch later bragged about putting Baker in the hospital and tried to cover it up by falsely saying in his police report that Baker had a firearm and fought back against the officers.
"These are not the actions of an officer acting in good faith," said Christopher Perras, trial lawyer for the U.S. Attorney's Office. "Those are the actions of a bully."
Kevin Short, attorney for Palkowitsch, said his client arrived on what appeared to be a dangerous scene and acted clearly and reasonably when he kicked Baker, who he believed had a gun.
"That's for everyone's benefit, including Mr. Baker's," said Short. He said the dog may have done more damage, or another officer may have used deadly force, had Palkowitsch not acted.