NFL scouts, after spending thousands of hours on their craft and hundreds of hours on a particular set of prospects, are frequently proven wrong.
What chance do you, me or Mel Kiper Jr. have of being right?
I've been writing about NFL drafts since 1990. I once had a Super Bowl-winning general manager give me his personal mock draft. He got every selection wrong, including his own team's, because trades and unexpected picks altered every other team's approach.
We don't know what we don't know, and often those who know far more than us don't know what they don't know.
This isn't to say that we shouldn't analyze and cover the draft, but that our preconceived notions about what the local NFL team should do are mostly uneducated guesses based on educated guesses from draft analysts that are nowhere near as educated as the guesses upon which the teams base their picks.
I needled the Vikings over their first-round maneuvers because this front office will have to prove itself before I give it the benefit of the doubt, and regretted the column as soon as the first racist e-mails arrived, attacking Vikings General Manager Kwesi Adofo-Mensah.
There were two major things wrong with those e-mails, other than the spelling:
- The stupid, Jim Crow-level bigotry, which presumed that all of the white GMs who preceded Adofo-Mensah should be assumed to be better, even though most of them got themselves fired by making bad decisions.
- The sheer certainty that Random Racist Fan knew immediately after a selection or a trade that the Vikings should have done better.
This is why Adofo-Mensah's first draft was, if nothing else, brave. He embraced risk when he could have avoided immediate and perhaps future criticism by making safe decisions.