A group of Minnesota lawmakers shaping an emergency insulin program said Monday that they have reached a bipartisan agreement to get the medication to people in need. But an essential detail remains unsolved: How to pay for it.
Legislators and diabetes advocates seized on the work group's progress to renew calls for a special session, hoping to jump-start an insulin program before the Legislature reconvenes in early 2020. But there was little indication that a final deal among top political leaders is imminent — or even that funding was the sole source of disagreement.
The past Legislative session ended amid discord over how to finance the insulin plan. Many lawmakers left St. Paul frustrated by their failure to help diabetics who are struggling with dramatically increased insulin costs. Some members formed the working group, made up of Republicans and Democrats from the House and Senate, and started discussions to sort out their differences.
Sen. Matt Little, DFL-Lakeville, announced Monday that they have come to an agreement on how the program would work. Their plan would provide a 20-day supply to people who have a past or current insulin prescription and meet certain financial requirements. Some could get an additional two months' supply depending on their circumstances.
The emergency medications would be available at most pharmacies, and the state's Department of Human Services (DHS) would administer the program. The work group does not yet have a cost estimate for the program.
Meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka, R-Nisswa, said he is concerned about giving that responsibility to DHS — an agency that recently went through a major top-level management shake-up.
"I don't think it's wise to add emergency work to an agency with a temporary commissioner, a history of program fraud and failure, and a reportedly hostile work culture. We'll continue to work on solutions that have actual agreement, clear funding, are not easily abused, and lower the costs of prescription drugs for Minnesotans who need them," Gazelka said in a statement.
Gazelka's remarks contrasted sharply with the optimism expressed by Little and others in the working group.