Rising home prices and higher interest rates may be a toxic cocktail for those considering a home purchase, but they don't have to be.
How much the home costs is surprisingly less important than the two most significant considerations: how long you will live in the home and how your income and assets will change.
The shorter your time horizon, the more your original purchase price matters. Your future income or assets (stock options, inheritance, etc.) inform how much you can stretch for the home.
If you make a chart with how long you plan to be in the home on the vertical (y-axis) and whether your assets and income are falling or growing across the horizontal (x-axis) you can create a framework for making the decision.
While there are obviously additional factors such as family size, total spending and other debt, this is a simple way of thinking about it.
If you are in the upper left quadrant, your assets and income are expected to be steady or to fall and you don't plan on living in the place for very long (less than five years), you should unequivocally rent. You are offloading unexpected costs to the landlord, don't have to make back the real estate agent's fees on a sale, and can more easily budget your housing costs.
If your expected income or assets are going to increase by more than inflation and you are not planning on going anywhere, you are in the lower right quadrant and should buy. You can even be comfortable stretching for the purchase.
Your original purchase price matters less when you live in a home for a long time because you won't have to worry about bringing a check to the closing if your house value falls (unless you have used your home equity like an ATM). You pay down a little of your mortgage every year, your income continues to increase so you can more easily afford that house payment and you can even make investment decisions relating to whether you wish to pay more into your mortgage or make other investments instead.