Might we be witness to a political pole reversal?

Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.

•••

Clearly, a major political realignment is underway in this country. The defection of RFK Jr. to the Trump campaign and the decision of Dick Cheney to join his daughter in voting for Kamala Harris is just the tip of a very large iceberg.

So just what is going on here? At first glance it doesn’t seem to make much sense. How could the son of the martyred RFK and the nephew of the murdered JFK make such a move? For that matter, how could Dick Cheney embrace the politics of a senator who voted to the left of Bernie Sanders?

Well, maybe it does make some seemingly strange sort of sense. Conventional wisdom suggests that the Republican Party has changed dramatically since Donald Trump has become its thrice-married and thrice-nominated standard bearer. But that same conventional wisdom should tell us that the Democratic Party has changed just as dramatically — and perhaps even more dramatically.

In fact, in many important respects the Republican Party of today has become the Democratic Party of yesteryear. Not all that long ago Democrats were the party of the working class. Now the GOP deserves that designation, especially when it is applied to union and non-union private-employee workers.

And public employees? Earlier generations of Democrats opposed public-employee unions. Now the party relies on them for votes and money, while its leaders castigate working class folks as “MAGA Republican” racists.

In addition, the stranglehold that the Democrats have had on Black and Hispanic voters is weakening, especially among men. The same might be said of basing policies on skin color, whether they be affirmative action or outright quotas. They, too, are weakening. As a result, the GOP is gradually sprouting its own version of a rainbow coalition — and one based on issues, not identities.

Speaking of sprouting, once upon a time the Republicans were the party of the fat cats. Now the Democrats can easily match them in this department. They’re just different cats who have been fattened in different ways.

Not that long ago the Democratic Party was much more the pro-life party than was the GOP. That, too, has been reversed — and by a wide margin at that.

The same goes for immigration. Remember when the likes of Paul Wellstone, Bernie Sanders and Cesar Chavez were all hawks on the subject of illegal immigration? No leading Democrat stakes out a position similar to that today. For that matter, remember when the Republican business class was lobbying for, even thirsting for, cheap immigrant labor, legal or otherwise?

Then there is the subject of Israel. Maybe this matter takes one TRU president to know another TRU president. That would be Donald Trump and Harry Truman. The latter recognized the state of Israel over the objections of many of his foreign policy and military advisers, including Gen. George Marshall, while the former moved the American embassy to Jerusalem and orchestrated the Abraham Accords.

Speaking of foreign policy, the burden of the Cold War, especially at its outset, was mainly borne by the Democratic Party with crucial support along the way from the GOP. In fact, in the end it was the Reaganite GOP that brought the Cold War to a successful conclusion. Today it is a Trump-led GOP that most evidences a willingness to stand up to the main totalitarian challenge of our day, namely China and its designs on Taiwan and perhaps elsewhere.

Returning finally to the domestic front, the Democrats were the senior partner in building both the welfare state and what has come to be termed the “deep state,” while the GOP was left to traipse along in a junior supporting role. At this point in our history we are at what might be termed a semi-crossroads: Some version of a welfare state is here to stay, but many versions of the deep state must be reduced and/or dismantled.

The current GOP is not out to dismantle the welfare state. If anything, it is committed to maintaining and solidifying it; hence its emphasis on border control. The economist Milton Friedman once contended that the U.S. could have either a welfare state or a fairly liberal border policy, but not both — and certainly not both at once.

Soviet Premier Josef Stalin once observed that the U.S. was the only country wealthy enough to be able to afford such a state. That would be a single state, not innumerable migrants from the rest of the world.

More than that, the U.S. also cannot afford an ever-expanding, highly politicized deep — or administrative — state. Such a state must be drastically reduced and politically neutered. In other words, it should become something that the original progressives envisioned that it would be, namely a source of apolitical, essentially neutral expertise.

One of those original progressives, specifically Theodore Roosevelt, was concerned about the ultimate direction of early-20th-century progressivism. On the one hand, he favored the creation of some sort of a regulatory state. On the other hand, the late-19th-century writings of a grandson of John Quincy Adams deeply worried him. That would be Brooks Adams, who authored a book with the imposing title of “The Law of Civilization and Decay.” Its central argument was at once simple and compelling: Civilizations collapse because they become overly centralized.

Avoiding such a collapse is the mission that today’s Republican Party is gearing up to lead. It is not at all a fascistic mission. If anything, it is the reverse of that. Nor is it anything remotely authoritarian, let alone Hitlerian.

This is also the moment for the ultimate reversal of our two major parties. Why? Because this time the Republicans will be the senior partner in the operation. Three questions remain: Will the GOP maintain power long enough to bring this reversal off? And will the Democrats be content to serve as the junior partner in this very needed venture? Or will we drift along until the worries of Brooks Adams and Theodore Roosevelt come true?

In the meantime, all of this might help explain why RFK Jr. is voting for Donald Trump and why Dick Cheney is casting his ballot for Kamala Harris.

John C. “Chuck” Chalberg writes from Bloomington. For many years he has performed as Theodore Roosevelt.