In the first series of earnings reports since the recent bank failures, investors are scrutinizing banks' deposit flows to judge the health of individual banks as well as the banking sector as a whole.
In the wake of those March bank runs on California's Silicon Valley Bank and New York's Signature Bank, some consumers and businesses moved their money from smaller and regional banks to bigger, national banks in the hopes their funds would be safer.
Minneapolis-based U.S. Bancorp, which reported its first-quarter results Wednesday, is among the larger banks that saw an uptick in deposits in the days immediately following the high-profile failures.
Terry Dolan, U.S. Bancorp chief financial officer, said the bank saw a "pretty significant inflow of deposits" in the first 10 days or so after Silicon Valley Bank collapsed.
Customers — mostly corporate and commercial — opened about a thousand new accounts, he said. There was also a "significant increase" in its consumer accounts in California, which seemed tied to the fallout.
U.S. Bancorp also saw about $10 billion of inflows into its money market funds, he added.
Executives at other big banks — including JPMorgan, Citigroup and Wells Fargo — have also professed in recent days to have seen a bump in deposits after the bank failures. But that wasn't always reflected on their first-quarter balance sheets, as inflation and higher interest rates have also negatively impacted overall deposit flows.
U.S. Bancorp, the nation's fifth-largest bank and the largest in Minnesota, lost $19 billion in total deposits in the first quarter, a 3.6% decline from the end of the fourth quarter.