Greater MSP has just about lost the M in MSP.
Minneapolis pulled most of its next year's funding for the regional economic development group, as council members questioned what benefit the city gets and raised concerns that Greater MSP pits local governments against each other in the race to offer incentives to companies.
"My constituents have a right to see some return on our investment," said Lisa Goodman, Minneapolis council member.
The move, which happened despite the objections of Mayor Betsy Hodges, is hardly debilitating for Greater MSP, but it is a symbolic blow.
The state's largest city and commercial capital shrugged off the public-private partnership built on the gospel of regionalism and backed by several of the state's top business executives and local officials across the metro.
"We're disappointed," said Michael Langley, Greater MSP's chief executive. "We're going to work very hard with the city council, with the mayor, with the city, to find a way to restore those resources so that they are fully active members."
Minneapolis has given $800,000 to Greater MSP since 2011, and the mayor's proposed 2017 budget included $125,000 for the group. Hours before budget approval, the council took all but $10,000 of that away and slated it for a full-time city employee focused on business retention and expansion within Minneapolis. Only Council Member Jacob Frey voted against the amendment.
Goodman said in an interview she was troubled by reports that Greater MSP orchestrated a bidding war between local governments when it tried to help Prime Therapeutics, an Eagan-based pharmacy benefits manager, scout for a new headquarters location. Greater MSP disputes this characterization, but Goodman asked other council members if they wanted to take action, and most of them did.