What if we're done with skyscrapers?
Not to say the ones we already have in the Twin Cities are going anywhere. Properly maintained, a skyscraper will stand for a long time. The concrete may weaken over time, but the steel will be strong, the IDS Center will not crumble. The Wells Fargo Center will not lean and topple in your children's lifetime. Your grandchildren will likely see the skyline of Minneapolis or St. Paul with the same tall towers you know today.
But will there be additions? There's a proposal by Hines to build a 29-story office building at 900 Marquette Av. S., but it might be the last one built for a while, unless everyone suddenly decides they hate working from home.
So, are we done with tall office towers? Will IDS forever reign as the highest point the Minneapolis skyline reached?
Let's back up and consider the purpose of the skyscraper.
Obviously, it's meant to make money. Of course, it stacks people into dense layers instead of spreading a commercial enterprise all over town. Its least important practical element is how it looks, but that's actually a critical component.
Since the early days of the tall buildings, the skyscraper — be it 10 floors, in the infancy of the structures, or a hundred — has been a boastful object, a claim to fame on behalf of the money men, a symbol of corporate or municipal health. A city wasn't a proper city without one, and every American city got its own, just to show that it had arrived.
For Minneapolis, the 26-story Rand Tower, built in 1928, was probably the one that signaled the city's status. For St. Paul, perhaps the 32-floor First National Bank Building put the city on the map in 1931. There were other tall structures, but nothing that said skyscraper the way these Gotham-flavored towers did.