Several Minnesota lawmakers are trying to bring housing developers and city officials to the bargaining table on legislation designed to create more affordable housing across the state.
DFL Rep. Steve Elkins debuted a wide-ranging bill Monday aimed at spurring the construction of more entry-level and multifamily housing. Called the "Housing Affordability Act," it follows a Star Tribune report Sunday that examined how single-family zoning restrictions and other regulations have contributed to racial segregation.
"NIMBYISM is alive and well, not just in the Twin Cities. This is a nationwide issue," said Elkins, of Bloomington. But he said the problem is particularly pronounced here. "I think we have the worst homeownership disparities between Caucasians and people of color. And as the Star Tribune story lays out starkly, this is why. These are the means by which this happens."
His proposal would limit many requirements cities impose on residential development, making it easier for developers to build more housing. The bill also would allow cities to assess certain fees and use other mechanisms to help cover infrastructure costs that come with the addition of more housing.
Some Republican legislators also are calling for zoning changes. Rep. Jim Nash, R-Waconia, has asked the co-chairs to reconvene the Legislative Commission on Housing Affordability, a bipartisan panel of state senators and representatives that met for the first and only time about 18 months ago. Co-chair Rep. Peter Fischer, DFL-Maplewood, said he plans to reconvene the commission this fall.
Nash would like the commission to look at city mandates such as minimum lot size or the type of exterior features required on new homes, but he acknowledged that improving home affordability for everyone is like a "quadratic equation" that will require multiple steps before it can be solved.
"For people who say they want to call Minnesota home, we should make it a little easier to call a piece of Minnesota your home and sink down your roots," Nash said Monday.
Elkins' bill faces a tricky path at the State Capitol. City officials have jettisoned past legislative efforts to restrict their local control over land use decisions, and developers have opposed attempts to allow cities to use development impact fees to cover infrastructure costs, Elkins said. He hopes that by bundling both changes into one package, he can strike an agreement.