Opinion editor’s note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
In recent weeks, Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life (MCCL), one of the state’s leading anti-abortion groups, announced a million-dollar ad campaign arguing against a proposed Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) that includes protections for gender and reproductive freedom.
If passed by the Minnesota House and Senate in the remaining days of this legislative session and subsequently approved by Minnesota voters in 2026, the amendment would enshrine equal rights for all in the state Constitution with clear protections for women, LGBTQ community members and pregnant people, regardless of pregnancy outcomes (“House DFLers push for expanded ERA on ballot,” front page, April 7). This explicit protection means that reproductive freedom would be protected in Minnesota, no matter who sits in the governor’s office, Legislature or the courts.
The irony of MCCL’s ad campaign, which has been scrutinized by the media and lambasted by Minnesotans on Reddit, is that groups like MCCL are exactly why Minnesota needs the ERA.
Founded in 1968, MCCL is part of the national movement that spent decades working to overturn Roe vs. Wade and ban abortion in every state. In Minnesota, MCCL has been responsible for passing myriad laws since the 1970s to make getting an abortion in Minnesota harder and more expensive.
While a lawsuit filed by Gender Justice was able to reverse many of these longstanding restrictions on abortion access through a court ruling made in 2022, there is no guarantee that a future Legislature, court or judge would uphold the reproductive freedom we have in Minnesota today.
Minnesota’s ERA would do three things: