In place of a tie, Tim Walz wore a bright orange and blue beaded necklace to the bill-signing ceremony, a Native-made Ojibwe medallion that was gifted to the governor.
It was a deliberate fashion choice to mark the significance of the moment: the state's highest office holder reinforcing in the law books the sovereignty of Minnesota's tribal nations. In putting his name to paper, Walz was promising in law that he and governors who follow him would consult government-to-government with the tribes.
"We're signing something that changes the way things have been done for 163 years," Walz said last week, surrounded by tribal leaders and their flags.
The legislation, agreed to in 11th-hour budget negotiations this summer, is the latest in the state government's push to improve its historically fraught relationships with Minnesota's 11 Native American tribes.
It requires each state agency to designate a liaison to work with tribes, as well as tribal-state relations training for those liaisons and other leaders in the state's workforce. In October, Minnesota House members held a two-day training with tribal leaders. The state Department of Transportation is erecting a dozen signs across northern Minnesota marking the boundaries of the state's 1854 treaty with three Ojibwe bands.
"For 400 years, we have been fighting to be seen and to be acknowledged," said Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan, a member of the White Earth Band of Ojibwe and Minnesota's first Native statewide elected official. "Sometimes when there's good stuff that happens, it's hard for us to completely acknowledge it because we've been fighting for so long."
Tribes negotiated for sovereignty in treaties when ceding vast swaths of their land to the U.S. government. That allows tribes to manage their own affairs and hold elections. Each of Minnesota's tribes is independent, creating sometimes complex working relationships with local and state officials.
Governors dating back to Jesse Ventura have issued executive orders pledging to work with the tribes, but tribal leaders said administrations still often acted on policy that affected their members without consulting them. And any future governor could end those executive orders.