The Legal Marijuana Now Party will no longer be recognized as a major political party in Minnesota after the state Supreme Court ruled Friday that it failed to meet legal requirements to maintain that status.
The unanimous ruling from the court directs the secretary of state’s office to “take all appropriate actions necessary” to make sure the Legal Marijuana Now Party is not considered a major party on state ballots in this year’s August primary and November general elections. Two justices did not participate in the ruling.
In February, the state DFL Party petitioned directly to the Supreme Court, arguing that the Legal Marijuana Now Party failed to comply with state law when filing its certification for major party status. DFL-led changes to election law enacted last spring raised the bar for qualifying as a major party.
The court found that the party “failed to satisfy the requirements” by not maintaining a state central committee subject to control of a party convention, as required by law.
“Major party status comes with major party responsibilities, and only the Minnesota DFL and Minnesota GOP have consistently met that standard,” DFL Party Chair Ken Martin said in a statement about the ruling.
The Legal Marijuana Now Party, which has been a major party in Minnesota since 2018, wrote in a statement it plans to appeal Friday’s ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court, which party officials believe “will likely find Minnesota’s DFL-written election law to be unconstitutional.”
Under the state Supreme Court ruling, the Legal Marijuana Now Party must instead try to qualify to participate in Minnesota elections as a minor party. There are benefits that come with major party status, including automatic ballot access, campaign subsidies under the state’s income tax checkoff and the ability to submit candidates in the state’s presidential primary election.
District Court Judge Edward Wahl, acting as a referee in the case, also recently sided with the DFL, finding that the Legal Marijuana Now Party did not establish committees or meet leadership requirements under the law. It also didn’t conduct “any convention for Minnesota’s eight congressional districts and at least 45 Minnesota state legislative districts or counties.”