Opinion editor's note: This article, part of our New Voices collection, was written by a first-time contributor to Star Tribune Opinion. For more information about our efforts to continually expand the range of views we publish, see startribune.com/opinion/newvoices.
•••
It has been roughly two months since Hamline University's student newspaper, the Hamline Oracle, published an article covering the now well-told controversy over Islamic art in classrooms. Since then, it doesn't take too long before one can find more than five major national news outlets adding their story to the pile. Despite this, the Oracle continues coverage of what the paper itself called a "media frenzy."
Of course, this should not be a surprise. Internet searches for "Hamline University" have increased about 25 times over since then. The situation has clearly reverberated in the institution's community, and as such deserves proper addressing. However, during the Oracle's coverage, the publication received a letter to the editor. The 2,000-word letter came from Mark Berkson, a professor of religion at the school. In it, Berkson questioned if the classroom incident was indeed an act of Islamophobia, citing the diversity of opinion within Islamic tradition.
The letter lasted about two days on the Oracle's website before being taken down. In its place, the paper's staff wrote an editorial stating, "Those in our community have expressed that a letter we published has caused them harm. We have decided, as an editorial board, to take it down."
With more nuanced voices coming into the fray regarding the classroom incident, discussion has now led Hamline University to admit to a "misstep" in firing the professor. It seems like the majority opinion has settled. Before the incident had properly entered national coverage, though, the Oracle had already reinstated Berkson's letter.
While many opportunist media sources, such as those that would have an entire section dedicated to woke "academic insanity," may try to imply the publication was pressured by a "woke mob" to remove the letter, my four years working at a similar newspaper disagree. Out of my two years overseeing the opinion section of Carleton College's student newspaper, the decision to remove the letter harks back to one that my colleagues and I faced relatively often.
Whether discussing sensitive topics such as the Israel-Palestine conflict or even the college's COVID-19 policies, we often struggled with our role and responsibility. How can we, as a platform, do our community's diversity right? How can we ensure that such diversity includes diversity of identity, as well as diversity of opinion? We can continue asking ourselves these questions to no end, but at the end of the week, words need to be printed on pages. The time to stop and consider the nuances is limited.
