A prosecutor and defense attorneys made opening statements Monday morning in the civil rights case of three former Minneapolis officers, forecasting a trial that will hinge on what the men thought and saw as Derek Chauvin knelt on George Floyd's neck for more than nine minutes.
In St. Paul's federal courthouse, Assistant U.S. Attorney Samantha Trepel described how Tou Thao, Thomas Lane and J. Alexander Kueng ignored obvious signs of grave distress in Floyd, whom they'd taken into custody. They continued to neglect their training and legal obligation to render medical aid as the window to save Floyd's life "slammed shut," Trepel said.
"Here, on May 25, Memorial Day 2020, for second after second, minute after minute, these three CPR-trained defendants stood or knelt next to officer Chauvin as he slowly killed George Floyd right in front of them," Trepel said.
The opening statements offered for the first time a window into the defense strategy, and a revelation that at least Lane plans to testify. In three separate introductory remarks, the defense attorneys described a hectic and at times scary situation in which the officers encountered a towering, erratic suspect who resisted their commands.
Thomas Plunkett, attorney for Kueng, called his client a "rookie officer" who was failed by the Minneapolis Police Department's inadequate training. He said Kueng saw only what was right in front of him and lacked the full context of the wide-view of bystander video that went viral. "That video is not what Alex Kueng saw," Plunkett said. "It's not what Alex Kueng perceived, and it's not what he experienced on May 25, 2020."
Signaling a contentious trial ahead, Plunkett called for a mistrial within the first 90 minutes of court, saying Trepel made inappropriate argumentative remarks in her opening statement. Judge Paul Magnuson rejected Plunkett's request.
'In your custody is in your care'
The first to address the jury, Trepel said that when police officers take a person into their custody, they become responsible for the person's safety.
"In your custody is in your care," Trepel said, a concept at the heart of the prosecution's case. "It's not just a moral responsibility — it's what the law requires under the U.S. Constitution."