Patient advocates in the Twin Cities are worried about access to a variety of health care services, including abortion and transgender care, and inpatient mental health treatment, if a megamerger proceeds between the Sanford and Fairview health systems.
Access was a recurring theme Tuesday night at a public meeting convened by Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison — the first of four scheduled to gather public input on the proposed combination.
In an interview after the meeting in St. Paul, Ellison said he understood the Sanford-Fairview merger could be concluded by the end of March. The attorney general wants his office's review of how the deal would affect health care competition, as well as charitable assets, to be completed shortly after the public meetings end on Jan. 31.
"There are a lot of important questions that were raised, ... and they're calling for answers," he said.
Several speakers expressed wariness over Fairview Health Services — a large Minnesota health care provider — being run from South Dakota by Sanford Health, with some pointing to examples of how the state has approached politically sensitive health care questions. One speaker raised the example of a former Sanford CEO who retired amid controversy after saying he didn't need to wear a mask to prevent the spread of COVID-19.
But Fairview Chief Executive James Hereford pushed back against the idea that Sanford is an outsider since the health system already runs 20 hospitals and 70 clinics in Minnesota.
"The reality is that Sanford has provided high-quality care to Minnesotans for nearly two decades," Hereford said during the meeting.
In November, Sioux Falls-based Sanford and Minneapolis-based Fairview proposed merging to create a health system with some 78,000 employees. The combined organization would be based in South Dakota and operate more than 50 hospitals, including the University of Minnesota Medical Center.