Interesting that a group of Minnesota lawmakers want to make the Labrador retriever the official state dog ("A fetching choice?" Jan. 30). According to the American Kennel Club, Labradors have been the most popular breed for each of the last five years, not just in Minnesota, but nationwide. Designating the Lab the state dog would be a little like deeming the hamburger the official state food.
Put me down for that group of folks who would prefer a mixed breed or a lovable mutt for state dogdom. The shelters are filled with mixed breeds, millions of which are euthanized each year, simply because the number of available dogs outnumbers prospective owners. When you adopt, you are saving a dog's life. Adopting a dog from a shelter is less expensive. The dog will usually come to you already spayed or neutered, and mixed-breed dogs are often healthier than purebred dogs.
There are dozens of fantastic pet rescue organizations and shelters throughout the Twin Cities. Four years ago we adopted a pit bull mix, Rhyker, just out of puppyhood from A Rotta Love Plus, a rescue group dedicated to rehoming Rottweilers and pit bulls. Rhyker has now become something of an ambassador for pitties. He worked very hard, and on his first attempt he aced the test for AKC's Canine Good Citizenship designation and now volunteers in assisted pet therapy settings.
Nothing against Labs, retrievers and poodles, but in our house, paws down, our favorite breed is rescued.
Stephen Monson, Golden Valley
• • •
I think it's heartwarming we are thinking of making the Labrador retriever our state dog. They are fine animals. But, given last week's weather, I think we should broaden the list of nominees, with the Siberian husky as a prime candidate. My entry, though, would be the St. Bernard, with its cask of brandy.
John Widen, Minneapolis
• • •
Our health care system needs fixing, our schools have never been fully funded, and we have no tax conformity to the federal tax system. Yet, at the Legislature they are proposing that the Labrador retriever be named the state dog? And Dakota County is dedicating funds to studying bringing back bison to county parks? (Minnesota section, Jan. 30.) Come on, government officials, we elected you to do a serious job! Get to it!
Lonni Skrentner, Edina
'AT-RISK' PROFILING PLAN DISSOLVES
Remaining questions and an opportunity to address harm
As we enter into Black History Month, residents of Ramsey County and St. Paul applaud the dissolution of a controversial data-sharing legal agreement between the city, county and schools that many feared would result in racial and ethnic profiling of students "predicted" to engage in future delinquency ("St. Paul data-sharing agreement called off over privacy concerns," Jan. 29). The disbandment of a joint powers agreement (JPA) that was created to apply predictive analytics to students' and families' private data was announced on International Data Privacy Day, and followed many months of grassroots advocacy and public education.
Communities support our agencies' stated intentions to better coordinate to deliver services "upstream" to youth and families, long before they are ensnared in the overly expansive nets of our criminal justice system. But before we launch into yet another round of community engagement, let's pause and reflect on lessons learned to avoid repeating the same mistakes. When we can honestly assess and repair harm, we can better collaborate to make better choices to promote positive outcomes for kids and families.