•••
In the coverage of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson’s killing I have noticed that much of the commentary so far has been about how to protect health care executives (“Companies rethinking security for top execs,” front page, Dec. 7). I may have missed some reporting, but I do not recall seeing stories about the health care insurance industry, and in particular UnitedHealthcare, planning to take a hard look at how fairly they process claims and how they can better serve their customers. The business model for some — not all — of these companies seems focused on how to deny coverage to people who faithfully pay their premiums with the expectation that their expenses will be covered should they be injured or become ill. The recent account of Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield’s plan to cut back on reimbursing anesthesia costs is a perfect example (“UHC CEO’s murder incites anger, but not at the killer,” Dec. 6). Thankfully, that plan was withdrawn following Thompson’s death.
The drive for larger profits has seriously affected how regular premium payers receive care. The idea that insurers exist for the benefit of their members is laughable. Like so many industries and businesses these days, paying executives and shareholders huge sums of money is what matters.
The insurance industry should be revisiting its purpose and corporate mission and seeing how far it has strayed from meeting clients’ health care needs. Executives should think about the reason that Thompson was targeted and the frustration that is evident across the country by people who have suffered or lost loved ones due to insufficient reimbursement.
Greed and entitlement have erased the values of compassion, integrity and fairness that so many citizens value. Health care insurers can, and must, do better.
Katherine Jursik, Plymouth
•••