After a night of drinks with colleagues in the Minnesota National Guard, the leader of Bonnie Daniels' unit invited her up to his office.
They chatted about their mutual love for country music and he showed her a few YouTube videos. Soon enough he was asking her to dance, but she told him it was late and she should leave. Then he turned off the lights, locked the door, lay down on his cot and told her to come over to him.
"He was four ranks above me," Daniels said she thought at the time. "If I don't go over to him, am I going to be in trouble tomorrow?"
He pulled her down on top of him, but she said she made it clear she was not going to sleep with him. When Daniels was finally able to get up to leave, he kissed her and put his hands down the front of her pants before letting her go.
She reported the assault in January 2016 and it took two years to investigate and discharge the perpetrator from the National Guard. He'd served 18 years by that point and Daniels said he had done this to other women, too. Those years took an emotional toll on Daniels, but her story and others prompted the Guard to evaluate its sexual assault cases and procedures. And now a bill moving through the Legislature aims to create a clear process for investigating assaults when the perpetrator and victim are both members of the Minnesota National Guard.
"For two years, there's no closure. There's no healing with a pending investigation," said Daniels, who no longer serves in the Guard. "I'm really hoping this bill will reduce the time it takes to investigate these cases."
There is no consistent and timely system for handling sexual assault cases in the Guard, which has roughly 13,000 members spread out across more than 60 communities.
Complaints first go to local law enforcement because members live and work all over the state.