— Trista Martinson still tears up about the help she received from a federal program as a young mother serving in the military.
She had enrolled in the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) program, which helps low-income pregnant and breastfeeding women and young children buy healthy foods as well as receive breastfeeding and nutrition education. But some new mothers, babies and infants may lose that support this year if Congress doesn’t fully fund WIC for the first time in 25 years.
“There shouldn’t be any shadow of doubt as to why WIC needs to be funded,” said Martinson, who chairs the Ramsey County Board. “If it wasn’t for WIC, my children would’ve suffered.”
On Thursday, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack visited a WIC clinic in St. Paul to urge Congress to fully fund the program, which has received bipartisan support for more than two decades. Afterward, he visited St. Charles in southern Minnesota to highlight renewable energy projects.
WIC funding is in place until March 1. After that, proposed funding levels won’t keep pace with increasing participation and will leave a $1 billion shortfall for the program funded by the U.S. Agriculture Department.
“Congress needs to understand and appreciate the importance of fully and adequately funding WIC,” Vilsack said, adding that states will have to cut programs. “That’s just an untenable circumstance.”

If that happens, an estimated 32,000 women, babies and infants in Minnesota may lose access as the state implements waiting lists for the first time in nearly three decades.
The Washington, D.C.-based Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimates that about 2 million women and children nationwide would not be able to receive WIC benefits by September, and Black and Hispanic families would be disproportionately affected. State officials then would have to decide how to handle the funding shortage, whether that would mean starting waiting lists, cutting hours or ending benefits.