At the end of last year, the split Brooklyn Center City Council approved a code of conduct detailing the behavior expected of council members — as well as a path toward reprimanding them for not following it.
One month later, a new member was sworn in, shifting the board’s dynamic. As one of its first actions, the new council tossed the code out, divided over whether to govern each others' behavior.
“We can see how things go for the next year, and see how many or few complaints I continue to receive and have nothing to do about it,” Mayor April Graves, who supported adopting the code, told the council after the 3-2 vote to repeal it.
Throughout the Twin Cities metro, more cities are debating standards for elected officials to follow, including suburbs that have seen heightened tensions among members. In some cases, the cities addressing acrimonious relationships want to outline clear consequences of unacceptable interactions among council members, the public and city staff. In others, mostly harmonious councils hope to ward off future tensions.
The moves comes as some cities throughout the metro have been putting their existing policies to the test, leading to legal threats and several councils in recent months censuring members over accusations of misconduct.
In Brooklyn Center, Graves argued the code was needed because there have been complaints filed against some officials, but the city hasn’t had guidance for addressing them. But opposing council members argued it wasn’t clear enough what could lead to a reprimand and worried that members could use the code for political gain.
“I see this as a potential for division,” Council Member Dan Jerzak, who voted to repeal the code, told the council.
In Orono, where council meetings have devolved into shouting matches and questions about land deals sparked controversy, a mostly new crop of elected leaders is considering rules to outline how they should interact with each other and avoid conflicts of interest.