A University of Minnesota alumna with expertise in education. An emergency room doctor overseeing university research. A nuclear engineering professor who’s spent years working as a provost.
When regents meet Monday to select the next U president, they’ll choose from three finalists with deep experience in different facets of higher education. And student and faculty leaders will be closely watching to see what the decision might mean for the future of the state’s flagship university.
The next U president will help craft a new strategic plan that outlines a long-term vision for the university and provides an opportunity to “basically do some internal soul-searching,” said Mark Bee, chair of the Faculty Consultative Committee.
How does the U want to prioritize research or teaching? How will it run its medical programs? How will it balance the desires of students, donors, lawmakers and others with a stake in the U’s future?
Even some of the finalists expect the decision will be as much about their qualifications as it is about which direction regents want to steer the university.
“The regents have, in some ways, a tough choice, in some ways, a great choice,” finalist James Holloway said during a visit to the Twin Cities campus earlier this month. “What they have to figure out is who fits best the immediate needs and the long-term needs of the University of Minnesota.”
Janie Mayeron, chair of the Board of Regents, cautioned against reading too much into their hiring decision, saying she’s confident each of the finalists has “the skillset, the desire and the ability” to fulfill all the university’s goals.
“To me, I don’t think our decision will be signaling that by selection of this candidate or that candidate that somehow our priorities have changed,” she said.