Student leaders pleaded with the University of Minnesota Board of Regents not to hike tuition, eliminate sports teams or give President Joan Gabel a big pay raise. The regents approved the measures anyway, with only a few members dissenting.
At the Minnesota State colleges and universities system, employees and students called on the board of trustees to discipline Chancellor Devinder Malhotra for allowing a college president accused of harassment and discrimination to stay on the job. Instead, the board gave Malhotra a glowing performance review, just months after he was criticized for not taking the misconduct allegations seriously.
Over the past two years, campus community members have grown increasingly frustrated with the governing boards of Minnesota's two public college systems, saying they listen mostly to administrators rather than the students and employees they serve. State lawmakers have taken notice, proposing legislation to change how members of the two boards are selected.
The U's regents need "to challenge the administration a little bit. Ask them some tough questions," said state Sen. Jason Rarick, R-Pine City, vice chair of the Senate Higher Education Committee, which held a hearing earlier this year on the school's decision to cut sports. "It just doesn't seem like that's happened at all recently."
Leaders of the two boards said they do listen to stakeholders but can't satisfy everyone when balancing the college systems' budgets.
"You try to be available, you try to be open, but you just don't always agree," said Steve Sviggum, vice chair of the U's Board of Regents. "Our mission is the fiduciary operation of the university … We try very hard to keep politics out of university decisions."
The U's 12 regents, who receive no pay and are elected by the Legislature, are charged with approving a $4 billion annual budget and other major policies. Their decisions to increase tuition while also raising administrator pay have long frustrated students and lawmakers, but their choices during the COVID-19 pandemic drew even more scrutiny.
In the fall of 2020, the regents voted 7-5 to eliminate the U's men's gymnastics, tennis and indoor track teams. Administrators said the move would help the athletics department address a large projected budget deficit and comply with federal Title IX rules by better balancing male and female athletes. The program cuts were estimated to save the U just under $2 million annually.