As Macy’s closes 150 stores over the next few years and puts more focus on luxury brands, Target could benefit, at least in the short term.
In many ways, this middle market has been in turmoil with department stores such as Sears all but disappearing and mall chain stores dwindling. At the same time, shoppers are either selectively choosing to save money or buy an item of high quality they think is worth the price. While Macy’s has different price points, its downsizing means one less option.
And if any store has been comfortable in the middle, it’s Target, analysts said.
“This is probably positive for Target in the short, medium term,” said Neil Saunders, managing director of the retail division of consulting company GlobalData. “One hundred fifty stores are a lot to take out. … There are not many alternatives. Other stores like J.C. Penney have closed many locations.”
Macy’s has yet to announce which locations will close, but the exodus of 30% of its stores could help Minneapolis-based Target, which boasts more than 1,900 stores across the United States, to grab valuable market share as former Macy’s customers with fewer brick-and-mortar options are pushed to find alternatives.
There are 11 Macy’s stores in Minnesota with most located in the Twin Cities metro.
While Macy’s and Target are not direct competitors like Von Maur and Macy’s, for example, the stores have become more similar in recent years. Macy’s has tried to appeal to bargain shoppers through its off-price Backstage concept and Target has brought in more brand names such as Levi’s and higher-end beauty products through in-store Ulta shops.

“Anytime a major competitor downsizes, it presents opportunities to grab more business,” said Carol Spieckerman, who leads Spieckerman Retail consultancy. “Over the years, Macy’s has gradually shifted down from the upper-middle of retail. Even though Target has focused more on the ‘pay less’ side of its brand promise lately, the brand still enjoys enviable loyalty among higher-income shoppers. As such, it’s not a stretch to say that Target could benefit more than others.”