If the city of Minneapolis forms a municipal electric utility, it stands to lose one of its biggest downtown employers: Xcel Energy.
Xcel CEO Ben Fowke said in an interview Thursday that the utility company would not keep its headquarters in the city if it took over distribution of electric service, a matter that is likely to go to voters in November and will receive a public hearing before the City Council on Aug. 1.
"There is not a utility in the nation that has their headquarters in a city that has municipalized," Fowke said in remarks to the Star Tribune editorial board.
The company, with a market value of $14 billion, operates in eight states. It has served Minneapolis for a century, has long maintained its headquarters on Nicollet Mall and now employs about 2,000 people downtown.
When Fowke talked about leaving, he didn't present it as a threat — as sports teams have done when demanding government subsidies — but rather as an inevitable result of a city utility takeover. But the prospect adds another wrinkle to the complex negotiations that are looming with City Hall as the company's 20-year franchise agreement with Minneapolis is set to expire at the end of 2014.
"Any municipalization is years down the road," said Council Member Cam Gordon, who is vice chairman of the Regulatory, Energy and Environment Committee. "We can't influence where anybody keeps their headquarters, and I think Minneapolis is a great place to keep their headquarters, but it's early to talk about that at this point."
Xcel seeks discussions
Fowke said he can't understand why city officials are talking about replacing Xcel with a municipal utility without first having serious discussions with the company.
"It is kind of astonishing to me that we don't have a dialogue," he said.