Three people who say they were seriously injured by Medtronic surgical staplers are suing the company for knowingly selling defective devices and intentionally hiding risks from doctors and patients.
An attorney for one of the plaintiffs said the three cases, filed in Minnesota and Texas courts in the waning days of 2019, might signal the beginning of litigation against Medtronic over the way it sells and reports safety information on its now-recalled staplers.
"This is all pretty fresh," said Noah Lauricella, a partner with Minneapolis-based GoldenbergLaw, which filed one of the three stapler cases against Medtronic. "Things are just starting to come to light, and I think we may have only seen the tip of the iceberg here in terms of the litigation."
Medtronic, one of the top companies in the multibillion-dollar market for staples and staplers used in surgery, declined to comment on the pending litigation.
The company filed a 219-page report with the Food and Drug Administration last month arguing that real-world experience with the 23 different internal stapling systems it sells confirmed the "consistent and favorable safety profile of Medtronic staplers." Overall, deaths were associated with the staplers in 0.0005% of cases, and injuries were associated with the devices 0.017% of the time.
"In most cases, [the deaths and injuries] are related to the inherent risks of the surgical procedure, patient co-morbidities, or the manner in which the device was used," the company said in its Dec. 19 filing with the FDA.
The three lawsuits filed against Medtronic in December over its surgical staplers involve situations in which patients were having gastrointestinal surgeries in December 2017 that required staples to be precisely placed in organs after surgery. The Medtronic staplers allegedly malfunctioned, for example, by creating holes without leaving behind staples or not properly closing implanted staples. Adverse effects included severe infections, cardiac problems, corrective surgeries, and hundreds of thousands of dollars in additional medical expenses.
"A reasonable and prudent manufacturer is or should be aware of the risk that if its product is defective, the [surgical] repair it is intended to secure could break loose, causing the contents of an organ undergoing repair to be released into the surrounding area of the body," said Harris County, Texas resident Cynthia Nicholson in her Dec. 20 complaint filed against Medtronic in Hennepin County District Court.