Minnesota's vehicle emissions standards are poised to take effect next year, after the U.S. Supreme Court last week declined to take up a lawsuit filed by Minnesota auto dealers challenging the new state rule.
Championed by Gov. Tim Walz, Minnesota became the first state in the Midwest to adopt California's stricter tailpipe emissions standards in an effort to combat climate change.
The new rule, which encountered stiff opposition from Republicans, also includes a mandate for automakers to bolster their stock of all-electric and hybrid vehicles across the state.
But not everyone was on board. The Minnesota Auto Dealers Association (MADA) filed suit against the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), claiming regulatory overreach.
The Minnesota Court of Appeals upheld the state's clean-car mandate in January, and the state Supreme Court denied the case in May — prompting the appeal to the nation's highest court.
In its petition to the high court, MADA's lawyers claimed tying the state's air-quality regulations to California's is folly. "Minnesota is not California," the brief states. "It does not have California's smog and air pollution problems — so long as Canada keeps its forests from burning down."
MADA President Scott Lambert said auto dealers were disappointed with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision.
"We believe using California's rules is not a good fit for Minnesota," Lambert said in an email. "Minnesota dealers are happy to sell customers electric vehicles if those customers choose to purchase them. But we are not in favor of a mandate that requires us to stock vehicles that have very little demand."