Not that winning changes everything, but Kirk Cousins these days is trying on diamond-crusted chains, running like he stole something, eating drive-thru ButterBurgers, teasing himself, needling beat writers and frequently flashing a smile that doesn't look like it was painted on by a public relations expert.
Cousins is back in the greater Washington D.C. area Sunday to face the team that cut him loose so the Vikings could sign him. His timing is ideal.
Washington has become a cesspool of an organization and a human-sized recycling bin for overestimated, underdeveloped, underdog and simply bad quarterbacks.
The Vikings are 6-1 with Cousins making clutch plays in an offense he is still learning, under former Washington assistant coach Kevin O'Connell.
He has yet to conclusively prove that the Vikings made the right decision in investing $150 million in him, but he has proven that Washington would have benefited from keeping his ability and durability in their building.
Asked this week why he didn't remain with the Commanders, Cousins said, "I would say there's probably a combination of reasons. I think anytime you go .500, you know — it's a league where you've got to win."
That's the conundrum for Cousins and every NFL quarterback who hasn't won a championship.
It's unreasonable to pin every game result on the quarterback, but it's impossible, over time, not to judge quarterbacks on game results.