Minnesota's largest school district will lose all but one of its school resource officers by the time classes begin Tuesday amid uncertainty over a controversial new ban on student restraints that Republicans want to repeal.
GOP legislators, flanked by police from across the metro area, said during a news conference Wednesday that they want Gov. Tim Walz to call a special session to fix what they say is a harmful law that makes campuses less safe. The provision approved as part of the sweeping education bill in May restricts the kinds of physical holds police can place students in, and police have said it would force officers to call for backup from off-campus patrols rather than resolve problems quickly.
"In emergency situations, minutes matter. Seconds matter," said Sen. Zach Duckworth, R-Lakeville, noting that he raised concerns with the provisions during an Education Policy Committee meeting in February.
The measure prompted law enforcement officials to pull 11 of the 12 school resource officers from the Anoka-Hennepin district — leaving just one at Champlin Park High School, district spokesman Jim Skelly said Wednesday. The district is the state's largest, serving nearly 39,000 students.
Officials from Anoka-Hennepin and the nearby Centennial district support the call to modify the law, as do several law enforcement agencies.
The Moorhead Police Department suspended its school resource officer program last week over concerns about the law. On Tuesday, Hennepin County Sheriff Dawanna Witt said she was removing the school resource office from Rockford High School because of the law's "ambiguous limitations" on the officer's ability to fulfill the duties of the job.
"Keeping our schools safe should never be a partisan issue," Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association General Counsel Imran Ali said in a statement. "With school starting next week, we must act with urgency and not wait until February."
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison issued a legal opinion declaring that the new law does not bar officers from "reasonable" uses of force, but several law enforcement agencies say they still lack clarity.