University of Minnesota regents are considering creating a new panel to review potential conflicts of interest for university presidents, one year after they faced criticism for letting then-President Joan Gabel take a position with a company that had business with the U.
"We want candid review, candid independent review, in terms of whether there is a conflict," Board Chair Janie Mayeron said Friday, during a meeting of the board's Governance and Policy Committee. "The critical question is: Who should be on, then?"
Board staffers presented regents with a proposal for a new panel with two regents, a compliance officer, faculty senate leader and community representative. The proposal, subject to revision based on regents' feedback, could come before the board for a vote next year.
The U has negotiated two conflict management plans for presidents in the past year — one for Gabel and another for interim President Jeff Ettinger, who took over this summer. It's currently searching for a new president, with the goal of naming finalists in February.
"This is a great time to have this discussion," said Regent Kodi Verhalen, who chairs the committee.
Potential conflicts — or perceived conflicts — for university presidents are currently reviewed by the U's Institutional Conflict Review Panel, which includes officials who report to the president. If that panel finds a conflict, it drafts a plan for managing it and sends it to the Board of Regents for review.
The details of a new panel are still being hashed out, and regents Friday discussed whether such a group should include officials who report to the president and, if so, whether they should have a vote.
"Having the chief compliance officer as a voting member does create a question for me, because they do report to the president," Verhalen said.